To be honest I couldn’t follow the topic in the essay. I
know nothing about Chinese dialect or the text that the person was analyzing
and so I found it hard to find a place to start when it came to understanding
it. However, I found it very informational when it came to analyzing an artifact.
While I think the situation will be slightly different – it seemed like Ding
was talking about his method of analyzing while talking about what he had found
using his methods. But I still think some things I noticed could be applied
While the artifact Ding was studying was text the reading
showed there is more then one method of analyzing it then simply reading it.
For instance the idea of understanding the history of the linguistics had never
occurred to me. I ‘ve never really thought about the history of a word, and my
linguistics class I’m taking this semester has just started to show me the
concept of understanding how we speak and what it means.
Another thing I noticed that while their many different
methods Ding of analyzing the text it always went back to her main goal, or
thesis. This is probably a good thing to keep in mind in any paper, but
especially when analyzing in several different ways. It could be easy to get
distracted or start to ramble.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.